首页> 外文OA文献 >Research ethics in an unethical world: The politics and morality of engaged research
【2h】

Research ethics in an unethical world: The politics and morality of engaged research

机译:不道德世界中的研究伦理:参与研究的政治和道德

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017726947\udWork, employment and society\ud 1 –12\ud© The Author(s) 2017\udReprints and permissions: \udsagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav\udDOI: 10.1177/0950017017726947\udjournals.sagepub.com/home/wes\udResearch ethics in an \udunethical world: The politics \udand morality of engaged \udresearch\udClaudio Morrison\udMiddlesex University, UK\udDevi Sacchetto\udUniversity of Padua, Italy\udAbstract\udThis article explores ethical dilemmas in researching the world of work. Recent contributions \udto \udWork, employment and society\ud have highlighted challenges for engaged research. Based on the \udemancipatory epistemologies of Bourdieu, Gramsci and Burawoy, the authors examine moral \udchallenges in workplace fieldwork, question the assumptions of mainstream ethics discourses \udand seek to identify an alternative approach. Instead of an ethics premised on a priori, universal \udprecepts that treasure academic neutrality, this article recognises a morality that responds to the \udsocial context of research with participation and commitment. The reflection in this study is based \udon fieldwork conducted in the former Soviet Union. Transformation societies present challenges \udto participatory ethnography but simultaneously provide considerable opportunities for developing \udan ethics of truth. An approach that can guide engaged researchers through social conflict’s ‘messy’ \udreality should hinge on loyalty to the emancipation struggles of those engaged in it.
机译:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017726947\ud工作,就业与社会\ ud 1 –12 \ ud©作者2017 \ ud转载和许可:\ udsagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav \ udDOI:10.1177 /0950017017726947\udjournals.sagepub.com/home/wes\ud\udethethical世界中的研究伦理:订婚\ udresearch \ udClaudio Morrison \ udMiddlesex大学的政治\ udand道德,英国\ udDevi Sacchetto \ ud意大利帕多瓦大学\ udAbstract \ ud本文探讨了研究劳动世界的道德困境。工作,就业和社会的最新进展突显了从事研究的挑战。基于布迪厄,葛兰西和布劳维的“解放主义”认识论,作者考察了工作场所实地考察中的道德挑战,对主流道德话语的假设提出质疑,并试图寻找另一种方法。本文不是以建立学术中立性的先验普遍性前提为前提的伦理学,而是认识到一种以参与和投入来回应研究的\ udsocial语境的道德。本研究中的反思基于在前苏联进行的乌冬面调查。转型社会对参与式人种学提出了挑战,但同时也为发展真理性的人种提供了相当多的机会。可以通过社会冲突的“混乱”来指导敬业的研究人员的方法,应该依靠忠于对从事研究的人们的解放斗争的忠诚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号